-------- Citation NR: 9800877-------
Decision Date: 01/13/98 Archive Date: 01/21/98 DOCKET NO. 97-05 078
On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office San Diego, CA
ISSUE: Service connection for prostate cancer due to Agent Orange exposure.
WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL: Appellant
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD, Alice A. Booher, Counsel
INTRODUCTION: The veteran had active service from July 1960 to October
1963. This appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (the Board) is
from rating action by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Regional Office (RO) in Salt Lake City.
The veteran testified before a Hearing Officer at the RO in
March 1997. A transcript of the hearing is of record. [Tr.]
The Board remanded the case in October 1997 for clarification
with regard to a Travel Board hearing. The veteran has since
asked that the appeal proceed expeditiously without an
additional personal hearing.
The Board notes that the veteran also has service connection
for major depression (previously diagnosed as schizophrenic
reaction), currently evaluated as 70 percent disabling.
During the course of this appeal, the veteran's claim with
regard to an increased rating for that disability was denied
in a rating by the RO in August 1997, and the veteran was so
informed and advised of his appellate rights.
At virtually the same time as the Board remand was dispatched
on the Agent Orange issue, a packet containing the veteran's
responses to the RO decision with regard to his psychiatric
rating was received by the Board without written waiver of
initial RO consideration pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 20.1304(c).
It is unclear whether the packet was or was not included with
the claims folder when it was returned to the RO for the
development on remand, but there is no RO reference to the
contents thereof in the claims folder.
There is no Substantive Appeal, i.e., a VA Form 9 or anything
in lieu thereof, in the file, and thus, that issue is not
before the Board at present. However, the Board calls the
attention of the RO thereto for required processing of that
claim under all pertinent criteria.
CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL
In substance, the veteran argues that while he was never in
Vietnam, per se, his exposure to dioxins including Agent
Orange and others, was extensive as a result of loading
planes and in other circumstances while he was stationed in
Okinawa and that his prostate cancer is the result thereof.
DECISION OF THE BOARD
The Board, in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A.
§ 7104 (West 1991 & Supp. 1997), has reviewed and considered
all of the evidence and material of record in the veteran's
claims file. Based on its review of the relevant evidence in
this matter, and for the following reasons and bases, it is
the decision of the Board that the record supports a grant of
entitlement to service connection for prostate cancer due to
Agent Orange exposure.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Credible evidence sustains a reasonable probability that
the veteran was exposed to dioxins while serving in Okinawa.
2. The veteran's recent prostate cancer must be reasonably
attributed to his inservice dioxin exposure.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The veteran's prostate cancer is the result of inservice
dioxin exposure. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 1991); 38
C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309 (1996).
REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
Criteria
Service connection may be established for a disability
incurred in or aggravated by active service. 38 U.S.C.A.
§ 1110 (West 1991). Additional provisions are to the effect
that service connection may be presumed in the case of a
veteran who served continuously for 90 days or more during a
period of war, if a certain disease, i.e., cancer, was
present to a compensable degree within a year of
No comments:
Post a Comment
Got something to share? Nothing commercial or off-topic, please.