Showing posts with label oregon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oregon. Show all posts

02 May 2015

Senator Jeff Merkley (Oregon) – Statement of Support for C-123 Agent Orange Veterans

Senator Merkley and his colleagues insist
that VA act now for C-123 veterans

Washington, D.C.  May 1, 2015   STATEMENT:

The Vietnam War ended almost 40 years ago, but some of our veterans are still suffering long-term health issues as a result of that war.  And there's at least one group of veterans who never even served in Vietnam, yet are casualties of the war nonetheless.  It's time to get them the health care they need and deserve.

Their story stems from their service aboard Fairchild C-123 planes in the '70s and early '80s.  Those planes were used to spray Agent Orange during the war, but were never properly decontaminated. An estimated 1,500 to 2,100 of our service members, including many reservists, trained and served on those planes until they were decommissioned in 1982, exposing them to dangerous levels of dioxins.

For nearly four years, I have worked to get the VA to recognize the claims of post-Vietnam veterans who flew in these contaminated planes.  Earlier this year, an Institute of Medicine study confirmed what I had been telling the VA for years: post-Vietnam veterans who served on the affected planes were exposed to potentially dangerous levels of dioxins - deadly compounds found in Agent Orange and other herbicides.

Recently, the VA took the first step towards ensuring veterans with diseases resulting from that exposure receive the proper benefits and compensation they deserve.  But our work is far from over.  The VA is still refusing to help former reservists.

Last week, I called on VA Secretary Robert McDonald to take the next step and extend full benefits and compensation to all affected C-123 veterans -- including reservists, who may constitute a vast majority of those affected.

Taking care of our service members is fundamental to who we are as a nation. We must uphold our promise to those who wear the uniform and fight for our nation. In the coming weeks, I will continue to push the VA to ensure that C-123 veterans get the help they deserve. They have stood up for us, and we must stand up for them.

09 October 2014

VA to Continue Town Hall Events at VA Facilities Nationwide

Good move, VHA and VBA!

 Secretary BobAnnounces VA to Continue Town Hall Events at VA Facilities Nationwide
Posted on October 8, 2014 by Donnie La Curan in Veteran News

Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert A. McDonald has directed all Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare and benefits facilities to continue to hold quarterly town-hall events to improve communication with, and hear directly from, Veterans nationwide. This follows the recent completion of town-halls at these facilities held between August and the end of September of this year.

“Every one of our medical centers and regional benefits offices held town hall meetings around the country in August and September, but we have more listening to do to better serve Veterans and their families,” said Secretary McDonald. “As part of our Road to Veterans Day, VA is taking a hard look at everything we do in order to reorganize the Department around the needs of Veterans. Direct feedback from Veterans, employees and stakeholders is an important component of that Roadmap, and key to improving our services and operations,” Secretary McDonald added.

Details of events at each location will be forthcoming from local facilities. Additionally, VA is looking to continue to improve the town hall notification process, making sure we have the benefit of extensive local input. In addition to Veterans and their families, the quarterly meetings are open to Congressional stakeholders, Veterans Service Organizations, Non-Governmental Organizations and other community partners.

08 October 2014

News Coverage of C-123 Issues – Just Published

This week saw two articles about our C-123 veterans' long journey towards VA recognition of our Agent Orange claims. The National Journal covered us on October 8 lending their great influcence in the DC area with the article repeated in other publications including Government Executive.

The second was an interview in Portland, Oregon, of Dr. Fred Berman. Berman co-authored the February Environmental Research article,  “Post­-Vietnam Military Herbicide Exposures in UC­123 Agent Orange Spray Aircraft.” I found this the most interesting, because the writer interviewing Dr. Berman "promoted" this major to an Air Force General.

Forgive me if I take a few days to savor this before offering a correction.

25 April 2014

Oregon's Civilian Agent Orange Victims

Agent Orange Zone Wednesday, April 11, 2012

The poisoning of Oregon’s Paradise Guest Viewpoint

http://special.registerguard.com/web/opinion/27872830-47/oregon-pesticides-health-
By Amy Pincus Merwin

(Appeared in print: Tuesday, April 10, 2012, page A9)


I am a survivor of Oregon’s Agent Orange war. I was never in Vietnam, but in 1980 I moved to Deadwood valley and was exposed to Agent Orange (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T) and its mutagenic byproduct, TCDD dioxin. I live with all the health issues of a Vietnam vet.

Agent Orange was used in Oregon’s national forests because Oregon State University professor emeritus Dr. Mike Newton, the godfather of forestry pesticides, changed the forestry model from clear-cut and slash-burn to clear-cut and spray, spray, spray. Oregon’s forests are no longer slash-burned, yet clear-cuts and intensive, repeated use of poison pesticides is standard practice.

In Lane County from Jan. 1 to March 31 more than 338 spray notices covering thousands of acres were sent to citizen subscribers. This pattern is repeated on corporate forests in every Oregon timber-producing county.

I attended the March 21 meeting of Oregon’s Pesticide Analytical and Response Center because the members, representing different Oregon agencies, were discussing the suspension of the Oregon Health Authority’s Highway 36/Triangle Lake investigation. I learned that after 33 years, PARC has no protocol for investigating Oregonians’ long-term, low-dose exposure to pesticides; has a backlog of many years of complaints about pesticide exposure that never seem to be addressed or resolved, and has never filled a required citizen-at-large position.
READ MORE: http://special.registerguard.com/web/opinion/27872830-47/oregon-pesticides-health-oregonians-spray.html.csp

OPB Reported Eastern Oregon Agent Orange Toxins in 2012

Agent Orange Dump Site Is Oregon Desert’s Toxic Legacy

May 3, 2012 | OPB
A deal cut by the state with the foreign company that owns the site has now been dropped. And the Department of Environmental Quality has no plans – or money – to clean it up.
About 60 miles north of Lakeview a barbed wire fence surrounds a patch of desert. Warning signs tell people to stay away.
Boyd Levet remembers watching in 1976 as the dump was created.
“It was probably just acres but it seemed like miles and miles of barrels just lined up in rows. It was a sight you would not expect to see in a place as beautiful as Oregon,” says Levet, who was a reporter back then for KOIN-TV.
25,513 barrels containing more than 1 million gallons of pesticide had been stacked next to Alkali Lake. They promptly started leaking.
Levet’s old news film shows the state of Oregon sent in bulldozers. They didn’t just bury the drums. They crushed them, allowing more toxics to pour out.
The chemicals include 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D – the prime ingredients of Agent Orange – notorious for its use during the Vietnam War.
Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality pushed the 25-thousand crushed barrels in trenches, then shoved dirt on top.
The trenches were not lined.
The dioxin-laced pesticides quickly reached the water table below, just 3- to 6-feet down.
Contaminated groundwater samples
“The groundwater near the landfill is very contaminated,” says Bob Schwarz, DEQ’s current project manager over the Alkali Lake Disposal Site. He adds:
“The chemicals caused the water to be a bright red color. Pretty striking to see.”
The state has put up a fence around it. Tests have measured contaminated ground water spreading nearly half a mile underground. The nearest families live 3 miles away. And the town of Christmas Valley is about 30 miles to the west.
“I would say if it was near any population center, even a town as small as Christmas Valley it could very well have been declared a Superfund site,” Schwarz says.
Former Lake County Commissioner J.R. Stewart is angry that the state does not intend to clean up the chemical dumpsite.
“If it’s not affecting you it’s not a problem. Well, it’s affecting Lake County,” he says. “It’s affecting the state of Oregon and it has the potential, in time, to be a great effect and a danger. Why not remedy a very bad situation as soon as possible, rather than turn a blind eye until you absolutely get beat over the head and have to do it?”
Stewart has been to the site several times. He says he can still smell the chemicals there. DEQ says those chemicals dissipate in the wind so they are no hazard as long as people stay away.
study for the EPA last year found contaminated water reaching the surface in an area known as habitat for the threatened western snowy plover. No studies have been done on whether they have been affected.
The company that originally made the Agent Orange has been sold several times since. The current owner is Bayer CropScience. In a written statement, a company spokesman says that Bayer CropScience thought it had reached “a fair and appropriate resolution” with DEQ in 2009.
The settlement did not address cleanup or future testing. Bayer would have paid 700-thousand dollars towards the 2-million dollars taxpayers have already spent fencing, burying and keeping tabs on the site. And if anyone else sued, Bayer would have paid 20% while taxpayers would cover 80 percent of litigation costs.
Lake County residents and officials filed objections, saying the proposed settlement let the company off the hook.
“The chemical companies you’re talking about are multi-billion dollar corporations. Come on,” Stewart says. “Let’s fight for what we know is right and get it done.”
Late last year, without any public announcement, DEQ quietly dropped the settlement. It has made no decision about pursuing the company. It has no plans to clean up the site, which could cost hundreds of millions of dollars.   
(note to disclose potential financial interest: the C-123 Veterans Association blog manager is vested in an Agfa-Bayer retirement benefit earned in 1989, through employment in Massachusetts and was not aware of this contamination until noting this OPB article on April 25,2014. At the time of his employment his firm was not associated with Bayer, and the contamination occurred many years before his employment with a firm acquired by Bayer in 1980.)

18 November 2013

Oregon Paper Covers C-123 Veterans & Agent Orange

Seeking justice for his fellow vets

Marcus Larson/News-Register<br><b>Wes Carter stands in front of a F-105G Thunderchief, a bomber used during the Vietnam War. Carter was drawn to McMinnville due, in part, to the Evergreen Air Museum.</b>
Marcus Larson/News-Register
Wes Carter stands in front of a F-105G Thunderchief, a bomber used during the Vietnam War. Carter was drawn to McMinnville due, in part, to the Evergreen Air Museum.
Starla Pointer, News-Register 
As an Army and Air Force Reserves medic, Maj. Wes Carter took care of the injured who were fighting for their lives.

25 September 2013

House of Representatives Begins Circulating Congressional Letter to VA About C-123 Veterans

Congresswoman Bonamici (D-OR) and her Republican colleague Congressman Paul Cook have begun circulating their bipartisan letter from the House of Representatives to VA Secretary Erik Shinseki, demanding justice for C-123 aircrew Agent Orange veterans. All veterans are urged to ask their congressional representatives to sign on and join this bipartisan effort! Congresswoman Bonamici has asked all veterans to urge their representatives to contact her office and join this important effort. The Senate, under leadership of Senator Richard Burr and Senator Jeff Merkley, has a similar effort underway.
Call Congress today – urge support for Congresswoman Bonamici and Congressman Cook's letter, shown below:

Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange Deserve VA Benefits

From: The Honorable Suzanne Bonamici
Sent By: carly.katz
Date: 9/25/2013

Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange Deserve VA Benefits

Dear Colleague:

Please join us in a letter to the Veterans Administration (VA) to reexamine its benefits policy for veterans exposed to Agent Orange after the Vietnam War.  Veterans who served on Agent Orange spray aircraft after the Vietnam War are facing serious health issues today due to their exposure to military herbicide residue.  These veterans served our country without knowledge of the risk to their health and they deserve to be treated fairly by the VA.  Despite evidence and support from the country’s top experts on Agent Orange, the VA refuses to provide these veterans with disability benefits. 

From 1972 to 1982, between 1500 and 2500 aircrew, aerial port, and maintenance staff served on C-123 aircraft that had been used during the Vietnam War to spray military herbicides, including Agent Orange.  Many of the country’s top experts on Agent Orange, including the Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Director of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, have written detailed statements supporting the crewmembers’ likely exposure to Agent Orange.  Despite this overwhelming evidence and support from the scientific community, the VA denies that any level of exposure to dioxin occurred.  As a result, many veterans’ disability claims have been denied by the VA.

After publication of a Washington Post story highlighting the serious health issues facing the C-123 veterans and the VA’s refusal to grant them benefits, the VA reversed its denial of disability benefits for LTCOL Paul Bailey.  This is a positive development, but there are still many other sick veterans waiting for the benefits they have earned.. 

Please join us in writing to Secretary Shinseki urging him to reevaluate previously denied claims and carefully consider pending claims.  To sign this letter, please contact Carly Katz in Rep. Bonamici’s office at carly.katz@mail.house.gov or Claire Cozad in Rep. Cook’s office at claire.cozad@mail.house.gov by COB October 3.

Sincerely,


Suzanne Bonamici                                         Paul Cook
Member of Congress                                     Member of Congress


---

October XX, 2013

Dear Secretary Shinseki:

Thank you for your work on behalf of our nation’s veterans.  We were pleased to hear that the Department of Veterans Affairs recently reversed its denial of disability benefits for LTCOL Paul Bailey, who served on C-123 aircraft in the years after the Vietnam War.  In light of this, we urge you to reevaluate previously-denied claims for other veterans who also served on C-123 aircraft.  In addition, we ask that you expedite review on current pending cases for the veterans who served aboard these planes, many of whom are suffering from multiple illnesses.

From 1972 to 1982, between 1500 and 2500 aircrew, aerial port, and maintenance staff served on C-123 aircraft that had been used during the Vietnam War to spray military herbicides, including Agent Orange.  These men and women served their country without knowledge of the danger posed to them by the dried herbicide residue on the aircraft.  Many of the country’s top experts on Agent Orange, including the Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Director of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, have written detailed statements supporting the claims of the  crewmembers that they were exposed to Agent Orange.  Despite overwhelming evidence and support from the scientific community, the VA continues to deny that any level of exposure occurred.

As described in a recent Washington Post article, a 2009 recommendation by Hill Air Force Base in Utah stated that “smelting is necessary for these 18 [C-123] aircraft so the Air Force will no longer be liable for ‘presumptive compensation’ claims to any who works around this ‘Agent Orange’ metal.”  This appears to indicate a desire to obscure evidence of Agent Orange exposure in order to deny benefits to those who served; if that is accurate, it is shameful and an affront to many who put their lives on the line for our country.

The C-123 veterans deserve better than this.  Given the vast evidence from the toxicology community, as well as documentation from the military, the VA must seriously reconsider its position on this issue.  Those whose claims were denied deserve to have their files reopened and reevaluated.  And the claims that are still being processed must be given expedited, careful, and thoughtful review.  This attention should be given to all C-123 veterans who, from 1972 to 1982, flew the same aircraft from the same bases and with the same mission.

We will continue to follow this issue closely.  We look forward to a prompt response from you outlining the steps you plan to take to help the C-123 veterans.

      /s/       Susan Bonamici