The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), nonetheless, concluded that medically retired veterans did not suffer from combat-related injuries, based on a PEB policy that burn pits are not “instrumentalities of war” except when being used to burn things like combat, simulated combat, Agent Orange exposure, spent ammunition, ordinance, or military vehicles. The PEB’s policy was contrary to the Army’s policy for administering Combat-Related Special Compensation, under which burn pits are treated as “instrumentalities of war.”
17 March 2026
Burn Pits Designed as “Instrumentalities of War” for Medical Retirement Combat-Related Findings
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), nonetheless, concluded that medically retired veterans did not suffer from combat-related injuries, based on a PEB policy that burn pits are not “instrumentalities of war” except when being used to burn things like combat, simulated combat, Agent Orange exposure, spent ammunition, ordinance, or military vehicles. The PEB’s policy was contrary to the Army’s policy for administering Combat-Related Special Compensation, under which burn pits are treated as “instrumentalities of war.”
28 September 2025
Newest Claims Project: Peripheral Neuropathy
I've drafted a sample VA disability claim for peripheral neuropathy as SECONDARY to diabetes. Vietnam War and C-123 veterans are presumed exposed to Agent Orange and already get service connection for diabetes if diagnosed. The effort here will be to illustrate how a veteran can get service connection by using diabetes type 2 (and other causes) and then peripheral neuropathy as a secondary issue.
Many vets have complained that their peripheral neuropathy claims long after Vietnam are denied due to VA's one year for symptoms requirement – this effort is an alternate approach using peripheral neuropathy as secondary to another illness or injury already recognized by VA as service connected. It’s for anyone, not just Agent Orange folks. Many other ailments are associated with peripheral neuropathy and if you have PN, you'd be wise to investigate.
07 September 2025
Pentagon Study To Help Flight Crew and Aviation Ground Support Veterans' Cancer Claims
About YOU as a veteran, and perhaps also you as a veteran with cancers the Pentagon has identified as somehow related to aviation. We’re addressing active duty as well as Reserve Component servicemembers.
A 2024 Pentagon study identified several cancers as being significantly higher among aircrews and aviation ground support than in a similar non-flying population: What’s greater? 87% melanoma, thyroid cancer 37%, and breast cancer and prostate cancer both 16% greater. The study is attached for your review.
We’re veterans of the 74th Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, Westover ARB, MA. Our history includes flying the infamous former Agent Orange spray airplanes, the C-123 Provider. Our planes remained contaminated with dioxin. It took many years of fighting until in 2015 VA finally conceded our exposures. Our veterans (plus many other bases and units- see attached lists)) are now presumed by VA as having been exposed and our claims for the various Agent Orange ailments are finally being honored. So much so, in fact, that over $80 million in medical care, compensation and survivor Agent Orange benefits have been won for C-123 veterans.
VA has typically denied Reserve Component exposure claims (except ours) insisting Reservists weren’t on active duty when exposed: no active duty = no benefits. They also insisted active duty veterans experiencing these cancers only many years after service weren’t injured with exposures and their claims were also denied.
The Pentagon study is our solution. It established that something associated with aviation is causing significantly greater risk of cancers, with worrisome percentages cited above. Now Reservists can claim an exposure injury and have the study (and their physician’s letter citing the study) as strong supporting proof. An exposure injury makes a Reservist a veteran per VA regulations. The same with active duty – if you flew, the study gives a link between flying/maintaining and the cancers. Being a Department of Defense report, the VA finds it damn hard to dispute, particularly because they contributed to it!
Here is information on the Pentagon study.
Here's the Vietnam Veterans of American excellent claims guide, although it focus on Agent Orange issues rather than aviation-related illnesses.


