Showing posts with label colorado. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colorado. Show all posts

04 March 2026

New York State Now Offers 100% Disabled Vets Property Tax Exemption!

FYI to all 100% disabled vets: beginning in 2027, the State of New York joins 27 other states in excusing VA-100% disabled vets from all or most primary residence property taxes. This enables the small number of affected vets to keep the homes they have, or to get homes, without what many find to be a brick-wall tax barrier to home ownership. This is very kind of the state, especially considering my home state of Colorado only exempts a fraction of the home's value, typically saving totally disabled vets only a few hundred dollars.

This is a big reason Colorado ranks only 27th in value of benefits permitted disabled veterans. All legislators need to realize that states with stronger benefits keep (or attract) veterans and the economic impact of the vets and their retirements/pensions more than outweighs the cost of the benefits.

19 March 2023

Colorado LSC initial cost estimate of $4.5 million for HCR 23-1002 (TDIU) was inaccurate

The Colorado LSC initial cost estimate of $4.5 million for TDIU was inaccurate
(see revised budget impact from LSC correction below, based on this analysis)

The Cost for Total Disability for Individual Unemployability (TDIU) Property Tax Exemption

Background:
1. TDIU is regulatory, not statutory. The key section of the regulation reads:
“Total disability ratings for compensation may be assigned, where the schedular rating is less than total, when the disabled person is, in the judgment of the rating agency, unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of service-connected disabilities. Provided that, if there is only one such disability, this disability shall be ratable at 60% or more, and that, if there are two or more disabilities, there shall be at least one disability ratable at 40% or more, and sufficient additional disability to bring the combined rating to 70% or more.” (38 CFR § 4.16a.)
2. TDIU benefits granted under the VA Rating Schedule are intended to compensate veterans for the average impairment in earning capacity that results from service-connected disease or injury. TDIU is a special additional benefit to address the truly unique disability picture of a veteran who is unemployable solely from service-connected disability, but for whom the application of the Rating Schedule does not fully reflect the veteran’s level of impairment. TDIU allows the veteran to receive compensation at a rate equivalent to that of a 100% schedular award.
3. VA pays basic compensation benefits to veterans incurring disabilities from injuries or diseases that were incurred or aggravated while on active military duty. VA rates the severity of all service-connected disabilities by using its Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The schedule lists a multitude of disabilities and assigns each disability a percentage rating, which is intended to represent an average earning impairment the veteran would experience in civilian occupations because of the disability. Veterans awarded service-connected disabilities are assigned single or combined (in case of multiple disabilities) ratings ranging from 0 to 100%, in increments of 10%, based on the rating schedule; this is known as a schedular rating. Diseases and injuries incurred or aggravated while on active duty are called service-connected disabilities. To avoid an unfair “one size fits all” disability evaluation, disability compensation can be increased to the full 100% level if VA determines that the veteran is factually unemployable (not able to engage in substantially gainful employment) based only on the service-connected disability exceeding in severity anticipated in the rating schedules. VA can assign a total disability rating of 100% to veterans who cannot perform substantial gainful employment because of service-connected disabilities, even though their schedular rating is significant but less than 100%...but is in fact totally disabling.
The cost estimate of $4.5 million if approved by the public is inaccurate. Several facts need to be considered that should reduce this significantly:
1. Most importantly, the GAO reports that 54% of TDIU veterans are age 65 or older, and thus already eligible for the senior property tax exemption if in their home ten years or more. Those TDIU veterans present no additional burden for the property tax exemption program. An unknown number of TDIU veterans under age 65 have partners over age 65 and thus otherwise eligible for the exemption.
2. 2847 Colorado TDIU veterans who are permanently and totally disabled from line-of-duty injuries are barred from the exemption. Colorado has 13589 VA 100% permanently and totally disabled veterans, 76% of whom are homeowners No VA data seems available to determine how many of these are “P&T (permanent and total)” to qualify for the current property tax exemption. VA reports the ratio of TDIU/100% veterans is about 45/100, and 46% of TDIU veterans are age 65 or younger. Thus, Colorado is ignoring the needs of 20% of our totally disabled homeowning vets under age 65. The exemption for TDIU veterans would be under $2 million annually.
3. Colorado seems unique among the states in distinguishing between VA 100% schedular and TDIU. Military.com rates Colorado, prizing ourself as “Veteran Friendly,” only as a mediocre 27th among the states offering veterans’ benefits.
4. 60%+ of TDIU veterans are in the World War II-Vietnam era. The age group 50-65 represents 28% of all TDIU recipients. Their participation in a property tax exemption program is just for a few years before aging into the senior exemption...they “age out” of any potential TDIU burden on the state.
According to the National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, the total veteran
population is set to decline from 20.8 million in 2015 to 12.0 million by 2045; total annual change is -1.8
5. 27.2% of Colorado’s veteran households have an “extraordinarily high” burden of total income for housing. 6.9% of veterans live below the poverty line, although totally disabled veterans’ disability benefits are above that level unless family size is considered.
6. 35% of TDIU beneficiaries have mental health conditions as their major diagnosis (of which more than two-thirds are posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] diagnoses), followed by musculoskeletal conditions (29%), and cardiovascular conditions (13%.)
7. Of all Colorado veterans receiving disability compensation, 6% are rated as 100% permanently and totally disabled. 4.5% of Colorado’s total veteran population have a disability rating of TDIU.
8. It is absolutely incorrect to refer to this category of veterans as “individually
unemployed.” Rather, they are totally disabled veterans who, solely because of their military injuries or illnesses, have been carefully assessed by VA physicians, claims officials and vocational specialists as being totally and permanently disabled, unable to work above any marginal employment. The term “total disability for individual unemployability” should be used throughout, rather than “unemployed!” TDIU veterans aren’t unemployed; they have left active duty service physically unable to work, whereas VA-rated 100% disabled veterans are often able to continue useful employment, trained for other opportunities, other careers, and are encouraged to find work for obvious financial and mental health reasons. “Extraneous” factors, such as nonservice-connected disabilities, injuries occurring after military service, availability of work, or voluntary withdrawal from the market are not considered as factors for TDIU ratings.
Where the rating schedule is found to be inadequate to fairly compensate a veteran for the inability to be gainfully employed, Veteran Benefit Administration (the administrative portion of VA) may refer cases consideration of a TDIU rating on an “extrascheduler” basis
9. The US Department of Veterans Affairs has two categories of veterans assessed to be totally and permanently disabled due to their injuries or illnesses. There are no differences in their federal benefits or compensation.
a. VA “100% permanent and total schedular.” is a rating schedule which assigns a degree of total disability using a formula set by law ( 38 CFR 3.340, 38 CFR 3.341(a), and 38 CFR 4.16) for a full range of illnesses and/or injuries suffered by veterans while on active duty (or, for Reserve Components, while on active training status for when called to federal service.)
b. The second is TDIU, a unique program created in 1933 to “fill the gap” in situations where a veteran’s line-of-duty illnesses or injuries are far more serious and exceed the schedular provisions, or when the combination of the veteran’s active duty illness or injuries are at least 70% but when considered with with other, lesser military injuries or illness have made the veteran totally disabled. This involves separate medical and administrative assessments: one evaluating military-related disabilities and a second to consider whether those military disabilities alone make employment impossible. This leaves the TDIU veteran at a fixed disability compensation at the 100% level, never able to continue productive employment.
TDIU criteria for unemployability are quite similar to those used by the Social Security Administration to determine total disability, except TDIU is far more restrictive, being based solely on military line-of-duty injuries or illnesses. SSDI considers the broader picture, including all military and civilian issues to determine total disability. A veteran can be SSDI-eligible for overall disability yet unqualified for TDIU unless military disabilities make anything above-marginal employment impossible. Note that many veterans having between 10%-90% VA disability (neither 100% nor TDIU) but are qualified to receive SSDI. Between SSDI, VA 100% disability and TDIU, TDIU is the most serious and restrictive disability scheme.
Like SSDI, a TDIU veteran is monitored for their continuing total disability. Earned income, whether employed or self-employed, other than sheltered workshop or below-poverty level income is disqualifying. Such a situation would result in termination of federal TDIU and any related state benefits. This limit applies only to the veteran's earnings, and not to the veteran's unearned income or household income. Managing TDIU benefits involves not only assessing initial eligibility for benefits, but also ensuring beneficiaries’ ongoing eligibility by identifying those who are not in compliance with the earnings limit.
VA rating specialists initiate TDIU evaluations when a veteran or their VA physician submits an application for TDIU benefits or his or her application for compensation benefits contains clear evidence of unemployability. In all cases, before granting benefits, rating specialists must evaluate the impact that the veteran’s service-connected disability(ies) have on his or her ability to perform gainful employment, which for decision-making purposes is generally interpreted as employment that is more than “marginal employment.”
Marginal employment for a TDIU veteran may also be held to exist, on a case-by-case basis, for a veteran maintaining employment at a sheltered workshop or family business with annual earnings at or below the poverty threshold.
VA rating specialists are to rely on various sources of information for the evidence needed to support such a determination, including an employment and earnings history furnished by the claimant, basic employment information from the claimant’s employers (if any), and a medical exam report from Veterans Health Administration (the medical side of VA.) If the claimant had received vocational rehabilitation assistance from VA or disability benefits from SSA, the rating specialist might also seek information on these services or benefit decisions. Many veterans seeking TDIU benefits seek a vocational evaluation, offered by many states’ employment agencies to assess any remaining employability.
Quality of life reduction, a serious issue and often a factor in other disability compensation programs, is not assessed in VA issues. About 30% of totally disabled veterans receive assistance from family members with activities of daily life impairments, thus greatly reducing household income.
Wes Carter, Chair
The C-123 Veterans Association



13 April 2022

COLORADO VETS SEEK TDIU STATE BENEFITS

Colorado's veterans with a VA rating of TDIU seek state disabled veteran property tax exemption benefits. This video explains our campaign.
See more at www. codisabledvet.blogspot.com



28 June 2021

American Legion – Nine Years of Supporting C-123 Veterans

The American Legion got the ball rolling for C-123 veterans and our Agent Orange concerns. In 2012 Dr. Jeanie Stellman and I visited the Legion's DC offices for a meeting with their national leadership. We briefed them on Stellman's research and Air Force materials that established our Agent Orange exposures, and asked the Legion to get behind us with the power of their nearly one million members.

They said yes, and for us to return the next day with a draft resolution to be voted on at their next national convention. Stellman and I wrote it that night, the Legion executives accepted it, and our resolution was eventually approved as Resolution 128 at the 2012 national convention.

The Legion also led in January 2015 after the Institute of Medicine determined we'd been exposed to Agent Orange aboard our aircraft. Along with the rest of the "Big Six" veterans organizations they insisted that VA Secretary Bob McDonald act on the IOM findings, which he finally did on June 19 2015. 2100 C-123 aircrews and maintainers, and their survivors, got VA Agent Orange benefits that day, with much thanks due the American Legion.

Over the next few years, a number of articles about C-123 veterans appeared in Legion publications. I've gathered them along with Resolution 128 for your review.

In May I asked our local post to initiate a Colorado resolution supporting Gold Star Wives property tax exemption, and it was approved by the entire state organization on June 28. Lesson for me: resolutions are the Legion's slow but steady march towards better veterans benefits.

And again...thanks Legion!

26 April 2021

Property Tax Relief for Colorado Gold Star Widows!

 

Fourteen states have a total property tax exemption, and they are an outstanding example to the other 36! Property tax relief is a vital benefit, helping to keep families of America's fallen servicemembers in reasonable financial health, and it is a good deal for each state! Veterans and their survivors bring a tremendous economic boon to their communities. 

Here in Colorado, over 26,000 jobs are created by retired military, vets and survivors! Their pensions pay for health care, food, transportation, consumer items, housing – and their pensions come to Colorado to circulate throughout the economy and multiply about five times over. Citizens, good veterans' benefits are even better for the states offering them. I sure wish Colorado was one of the leaders, but instead, only about 25th among the states.

Follow at www.codisabledvet.blogspot.com

16 January 2019

Coast Guard Paychecks Stopped - I’m offering my savings

The Coast Guard has stopped paying their uniformed personal effective today, so I have offered all my savings to the Coast Guard foundation for helping Coasties in Colorado. Not as a gift, but rather direct $3,000 loans until personnel can repay once their paychecks start up again.

You can also help by contacting their organizers:
Rear Admiral Cari Thomas USCG Retired
https://m.facebook.com/CGMutualAssist/.     http://www.cgmahq.org/

o far as I've learned, various drives are underway, such as the $12 million from USAA, but only $1000 per servicemember with dependents, or $750 without. Folks, that's not enough to cover rent! Further, some efforts are focused on $20 gift cards...you can see the mess 40,000 Coasties are in due to the shutdown.

The good news is that the President signed legislation assuring them of their lost wages when the budget turmoil is over. Thus loans can be expected to be repaid promptly, and I'm willing to take any risk otherwise.

Find a way to help out. I don't see how we can sit on our butts (and on our savings accounts) when comrades in arms are on duty worldwide without pay for their families!

What are your thoughts and ideas?

       Wes Carter

24 April 2016

VA report fails to build confidence (Editorial in my own local newspaper, Fort Collins CO)

Note: I reprint this newspaper's editorial because it is about my local VA clinic, in which I,too, was unable to get timely appointments for a series of orthopedic and oncology issues, and instead sought surgeries elsewhere. It has always been on my mind how much VA has saved by not providing my three hip replacements, six neck and back surgeries, two shoulder surgeries, cancer surgery with subsequent radiation and chemo, It has also been on my mind how financially destructive it would have been on the family if I'd not had other insurance options – I would probably have not sought care for several issues. Are today's veterans forced to those hard choices?
The general public may not know that in many situations, a disabled vet isn't permitted VA medical care and other benefits until VA finishes evaluation his/her claim. That can take years, especially if the claim is first denied and forced into a three to five year appeals delay.That's a long wait when one already has cancer or other issues for which care is sought.
                  If you can get an appointment. I couldn't.

EDITORIAL BOARD
APRIL 24, 2016:



New reports published earlier this month show the Fort Collins Veterans Affairs office blamed its scheduling problems on a single manager in the business office who is no longer with the clinic.
Roughly two years ago, the Coloradoan reported the VA office falsified wait times for local veterans seeking medical care.
Fast forward to earlier this month, and spokesperson Samuel House said, "All appropriate action was taken against the employees."
The Editorial Board struggles with this determination for a number of reasons.
First, we know this problem is widespread. A VA inspector general’s report found it was possible that more than 300,000 veterans nationwide died before their applications, which precede appointments, were processed.
Are we to believe that persistent problems across the country, resulting in an unquantifiable number of delays for care, were isolated to a single person in the Fort Collins office?
In May 2014, the Coloradoan reported staff in Fort Collins was manipulating logs to make it look like they were following the VA’s policy of granting appointments within 14 days of the veterans’ desired dates.
Back in March 2013, the Fort Collins clinic “was having problems with scheduling, employee morale and professionalism, and lack of teamwork between the (medical support assistants)," the report from the federal Office of the Medical Inspector stated. To address those issues, employees were transferred between Cheyenne and Fort Collins, according to the OMI report. The transfers to Fort Collins reported that scheduling in Fort Collins was "fixed" by having staff change appointment dates to be within two weeks of the desired appointment date, an agency goal.
In the report released earlier this month, the employee who was let go defended her actions, saying "this had no effect on the veterans because they received the same appointment they otherwise would have received. When asked if she thought this was “gaming” the system she replied, 'yes.'"

10 March 2016

Out of the blue - a VA staffer said her husband is a C-123 vet and was helped by our blog!

On Tuesday I spoke briefly at Colorado's United Veterans Committee about disabled veteran taxes. After, as we were all leaving, a wonderful VA lady came up to say her own husband is a C-123 vet, and he now has his claim progressing. They've been following the blog, and I hope got some useful resources for their claim.

I hope she'll write in!

24 December 2015

For Years, Colorado Legislators Have Blocked Property Tax Relief Due Some VA 100% Permanent and Totally Disabled Veterans


Colorado's statute provides property tax relief for VA-certified permanently and totally disabled state veterans. Colorado's law covers all of them, but some Colorado legislators have mentioned to the state's Veterans Affairs Department they'd like exceptions made, on the basis of their personal preference! The federal VA provides certification for this type of veteran and the state accepts that is the qualifier for relief, the benefit being half of the taxes on the first $200,000 of assessed home value.

The problem is that Colorado pretends there are extra words in its statute and adds, unofficially and without legislation, an unwritten preference suggested by some legislators to disqualify those disabled veterans certified by VA as "permanent and totally disabled" if any portion of the total disability is due to unemployability. Many vets are 60% or more for their service-connected disability but other disabilities make it such that the are unable to work even at the poverty level. They still are certified by VA as "100% permanently and totally disabled", but Colorado adds an unofficial, unmentioned qualifier...to exclude vets with any part of their VA award being for unemployability.

They say this is because some of the legislators who drafted the legislation then told the Colorado Veterans Department that's how they'd like the extra, interpretation added but only AFTER the language had been approved by the people of the state, their legislators, and the governor. Time for a little extra-legal fine tuning, not by adding eligible veterans by but excluding eligible veterans otherwise clearly certified by the VA as eligible for Colorado disabled veteran property tax relief. They did this, not by the clear words of the Colorado statute nor the equally clear words of the VA letter certifying some disabled veterans with unemployability awards as "100% permanent and totally disabled." They did this by simply telling the Colorado Veterans Affairs how they'd prefer the statute to be more exclusive, despite the language of the law just passed.

Only by the legislators' personal preference is it that totally disabled unemployability-qualified veterans are to be excluded, despite their word-for-word qualification under the Colorado law.

Personal preferences of some Colorado legislators somehow trump the clear language of the law, the votes of both houses of its legislators, and the governor's signature and the massive support of Colorado's citizens who want the states veterans given a small and vital benefit.

Here's the law:

 " (1.5)  "Exemption" means the property tax exemptions for qualifying seniors and qualifying disabled veterans allowed by section 39-3-203.

  (3.5)  "Qualifying disabled veteran" means an individual who has served on active duty in the United States armed forces, including a member of the Colorado National Guard who has been ordered into the active military service of the United States, has been separated therefrom under honorable conditions, and has established a service-connected disability that has been rated by the United States department of veterans affairs as one hundred percent permanent and total disability pursuant to a law or regulation administered by the department."

Why the distinction? Anybody catch the word "unemployability" Anybody else notice that it is the United States Department of Veterans Affairs which certifies 100% permanent and totally disabled veterans, not the state of Colorado?

28 March 2015

C-123 Agent Orange Exposure Benefits: NO WORD YET

VA Hospitals & C-123 Veterans
One month ago, Secretary McDonald responded to Senator Brown's question with assurances that VA was to announce its program for treating C-123 veterans' Agent Orange-related illnesses within a week
.

Since then, from the Secretary down to his public affairs staff, different reasons have been floated to explain why VA still hasn't announced its program. And the most recent input from VA to the media is that the C-123 program's announcement has been postponed with no date suggested.

This is a bad, bad deal for us.

Colorado C-123 vets lose this year's Colorado disabled veteran property tax exemption, paying about $1,000 on taxes because VA hasn't finished their claims. Other states' veterans are in much the same situation...state benefits withheld until the VA decides what to do about Agent Orange illnesses.

All states' C-123 veterans are still locked out of VA hospitals, unless they're otherwise eligible for care. We're all senior citizens now, a time in life when diseases ravage us so unrelentingly. Rather than treat our Agent Orange illnesses, VA has us standing outside their hospitals with our fingers stuck to the door bell...not allowed in until their C-123 program is announced and our disability claims can be processed.

04 May 2014

Fort Collins VA Clinic Also Falsified Vet's Records – USA Today

(Blogmaster's Note: I am a patient at the Fort Collins VA Clinic, transferring my care there from Portland last year. I have absolutely no complaints regarding delays, quality of care nor qualify of compassion. As a retired hospital administrator, Air Force retiree and chair of a veterans organization, I'm quite critical of shortfalls. In months here in Fort Collins, have seen none of the issues reported below. This USA Today report stands on its own. I have met Phoenix reporter Dennis Wagner and trust his journalism completely. Thus, today's story leaves me confused and disappointed. This story was also published in the AF Times, Army Times and Navy Times. In a related story, Congressman Mike Coffman R-CO) has demanded an immediate Inspector General investigation into the Fort Collins deceptions.)

Gregg Zoroya, USA TODAY: VA investigation of one of its outpatient clinics in Colorado reveals how ingrained delays in medical care may be for an agency struggling to rapidly treat nearly 9 million veterans a year amid allegations that dozens have died because of delays.
Clerks at the Department of Veterans Affairs clinic in Fort Collins were instructed last year how to falsify appointment records so it appeared the small staff of doctors was seeing patients within the agency's goal of 14 days, according to the investigation.
A copy of the findings by the VA's Office of Medical Inspector was provided to USA TODAY.
Many of the 6,300 veterans treated at the outpatient clinic waited months to be seen. If the clerical staff allowed records to reflect that veterans waited longer than 14 days, they were punished by being placed on a "bad boy list," the report shows.
"Employees reported that scheduling was 'fixed,' " the findings say.
After enduring a year of criticism that the VA took too long to deliver earned compensation to disabled veterans, a new wave of attacks is building over slow medical care.
Department officials revealed last month that 23 deaths of veterans were linked to delayed cancer screenings dating back four years. More recently, a retired doctor, Sam Foote, alleged that 40 other veterans died because of treatment delays at a VA hospital in Phoenix. VA officials say there's no evidence so far to support those claims, but the hospital administrator was placed on leave pending an investigation by the agency's inspector general .
Sally Eliano, an Arizona woman, complained that her 71-year-old father-in-law, a Navy veteran, died after delays at the VA hospital in Phoenix in the treatment of bladder cancer.
The Medical Inspector's probe in the Fort Collins case could not confirm that patients had been harmed "due to the lack of specific cases evaluation."
A key allegation by the whistle-blowing retired doctor in Phoenix is that staff members manipulated records to hide delays. The same practice was found by the VA Office of Medical Inspector at the clinic in Fort Collins.
While investigators found that VA policies were violated, local medical leaders concluded that the violations were less intentional than the result of confusion and no disciplinary action was taken, says a VA statement released Saturday. Retraining and weekly audits were implemented, the statement says.
The VA in 2013 revamped some of its tracking procedures to better gauge wait times for nearly 100 million medical appointments each year at 151 hospitals and 820 clinics.
The agency found that only 41% of new VA medical patients were seen within 14 days last year, down from 90% reported in 2012 under an old, now-abandoned measurement method.
The VA found it wasn't doing so well with first-time mental health appointments, either. The agency reported in 2011 that 95% of new mental health patients were seen within 14 days, but the new tracking system found the rate in 2013 was 66%.
Mike Davies, the VA director of access, says the revised system for tracking new-patient appointments has finally provided accurate measurements on wait times. He says the department's commitment to track every single appointment is far more stringent than industry standards.
"I don't think there's any other health-care system that does this," Davies says.
He says the VA now can better determine what additional resources it needs to make sure veterans are treated more rapidly.
As a result of what happened at Fort Collins — the Medical Inspector's investigation was completed in December — the VA has done four site inspections to see whether timely treatment standards are being met, Davies says.
They found "other instances of misunderstanding" wait-time tracking requirements, "but we have not found any widespread patterns of misunderstanding," Davies says.
But federal investigators say that despite these efforts, the VA health-care system remains plagued by delays in treatment and opportunities to cover them up.
"Data has to be reliable to be useful," says Debra Draper, who directs an investigative staff for the Government Accountability Office. "So if you've people going in there and doing all kinds of things (to change the data), it really is not reliable."
Draper has led investigations into VA health care problems for years and says the agency has been struggling to accurately assess wait times for decades.
Draper says a key problem is a lack of oversight by top VA officials. The Fort Collins problems, for example, came to light only after a whistle-blower stepped forward.
Numbers of outpatient visits are spiraling, in large part because of an aging veteran population and young combat survivors suffering multiple medical and psychological issues.
At Fort Collins and the nearbyVA Medical Center in Cheyenne, Wyo. — which oversees seven clinics, including the one in Fort Collins — officials complained they didn't have enough doctors or supporting staff.
The result is jobs are left undone, VA investigators found. Staff required to follow up with veterans to schedule necessary appointments often didn't have time.
Investigators found that nearly half the clinic's 6,000 veteran patients did not have necessary medical appointments scheduled.
"Many of the (clerks) reported significant stress when trying to explain to veterans why they cannot make earlier appointments for them," the report says. "By entering (false data), the wait time for that patient appears to be zero days. ... The wait times were actually much longer."
Contributing: Dennis Wagner of The Arizona Republic

07 January 2014

C-123 Colorado Resident Veteran Sought

Hello, Westover, Rickenbacker and Pittsburgh: I need to identify post-Vietnam C-123 vets living in Colorado...if you can help me find some, please drop me a note as soon as possible.
       Wes