The Balance of
Arguments
Veterans:
- "It is my opinion that (C-123) aircrews operating in
this, and similar, environments were exposed to TCDD."
(Dr. Tom Sinks, Deputy Director, CDC/Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry)
- "It is my
professional opinion that (veteran name
withheld) (and likely, other
aircrew veterans who flew these aircraft in the same time period) was
exposed to harmful levels of dioxin."
(Dr. Fred Berman, Oregon Health
Sciences University Toxicology Department)
- "(The C-123 is) heavily
contaminated. A danger to public health."
- "In my opinion, it is highly
likely that you and other crew members were exposed to the herbicides and to
their highly toxic contaminant, 2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (dioxin, for
short)"
(Dr. Jeanne Stellman, Professor
Emerita, Columbia University School of Public Health)
-
In my professional judgment you are at increased risk for illness from the
dioxin in Agent Orange because of your exposure to it from your (C-123)
military service”
(Dr. Arnold Schecter, Professor,
University of Texas School of Public Health)
VA:
- "No
conclusive evidence that TCDD exposure causes any adverse health effects."
(VA Compensation Services in claim denial)
- "TCDD
is the most toxic of the dioxins, and is classified as a human carcinogen by
the Environmental Protection Agency."
- “(C-123 veterans’) Claims are decided on an individual
basis."
VA Public Health Bulletin (however: 100% of claims
denied - 0% approved, but on an "individual" basis, of
course!)
- C-123 vets are "Trash-haulers. Freeloaders looking for a
tax-free dollar. I have no respect for them but do for combat vets."
(The DoD & USAF consultant on Agent Orange, his 2011 email re: C-123 vets; in 2010 he recommended “quiet, low-visibility” destruction of C-123 fleet to prevent veterans learning of C-123 contamination & crew exposure. Most C-123 veterans are combat veterans of Vietnam, Desert Storm or both)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Got something to share? Nothing commercial or off-topic, please.