Showing posts with label linda schwartz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label linda schwartz. Show all posts

24 September 2016

VA ESTIMATE OF C-123 VETERANS' AGENT ORANGE DISABILITY COMPENSATION? $46,000,000

 $46,000,000

The biggest part of the battle was behind us. Finally, the Institute of Medicine had completed their two year study by a distinguished group of scientists and physicians, and agreed with us that we have been exposed to Agent Orange and harmed by that toxin. Their report was submitted to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on January 9, 2015.

The IOM had a public hearing to announce their conclusions, and I attended to represent both active-duty and Reserve post-Vietnam C-123 veterans. Several attorneys from the law firm that represented us accompanied me. Observers were there from the US Air Force, the Senate, CDC, the press and the VA. 

Finally, I was to meet Assistant Secretary Linda Schwartz, a medically retired Air Force flight nurse who’d flown with us on occasion "back in the day" and is herself a C-123 veteran. Four years earlier I’d met her on the Internet in her capacity as Connecticut’s Commissioner of Veterans Affairs. She immediately offered the first of many critical suggestions on the conduct of our contest with the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

We’d won. No longer could the VA insist on its imaginary “overwhelming preponderance of evidence” against our disability claims. That evidence had been shown to be a total pretense, a policy sham advanced by the VBA Agent Orange desk and the VHA Post-Deployment Public Health Section. Both of these VA functions had been policy-driven to oppose our claims and this marks their defeat. In addition, the US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine C-123 report released in 2012 was shown to be both scientifically and medically flawed (Lurker, 2014.) The IOM accused both the VA and the military of deliberately ignoring, disputing or minimizing all proofs of our exposure to prevent our claims.

It was quite a ground-breaking moment. Never before had a single group of veterans successfully argued its case and established the facts surrounding their Agent Orange exposure.  Before, as well as after us, VA always successfully argued against other veterans' claims. We’d won, but as Senator Richard Burr (R-NC),  ranking member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, said in his own press release, “it shouldn’t have taken this long or been this hard.”

It remained for VA to finally decide whether and how to implement the conclusions of the IOM. This was a process we were unfamiliar with and one that took VA Secretary McDonald six months to complete and publish in the Federal Register.

Because of requirements built into the 1991 Agent Orange Act regarding how VA treats IOM conclusions, it was likely that VA would acknowledge our exposures. A working group was formed within the department and it submitted its recommendations to the Secretary.

Now the internal machinations began within VA. One of the biggest was to determine how much this was to cost the government.  The White House Office of Management and Budget weighed in with its estimate of $46 million to cover disability compensation. OMB made no estimate of the cost of medical care or survivor benefits each item expected to exceed the cost of disability compensation itself. In 2014, working with the Harvard School of Government, we calculated the total cost to be nearly $250,000,000!

On June 18 2015, I was invited to VA headquarters to hear Secretary McDonald’s decision:

1.   • VA would acknowledge the statutory veteran status per U.S.C. Title 38 of our aircrews, aeromedical evacuation crews and aircraft maintenance technicians, if they had any of the presumptive illnesses associated with Agent Orange. This was legally necessary to permit VA to provide benefits because the law is all specified ”veterans.” Unless activated, Reservists are not considered veterans in the law. The VA decision did not award veteran status to anyone not confirmed to have an Agent Orange illness.
2.    • VA would begin compensation effective June 19, 2015 and would not require claim submitted prior to that date to be resubmitted. Disappointingly, VA also decided against any retroactive compensation. This was disappointing to us because some have had claims in to VA for seven or more years.
3.    • VA would give all claims submitted for the next year and effective date of June 19, 2015 in effect making those claims partially retroactive.

I had always suggested a total number of our C-123 veterans to be about 2100. VA estimates that 25% of the personnel who served in Vietnam now have disability benefits for their exposures. If that same 25% applies to us, it means an average compensation of over $88,000 per veteran. The Harvard estimate of $250 million may yet be correct calculating in survivor benefits and the cost of medical care given our veterans.

That, and the VA medical care plus other benefits were what we had fought for these last four years. One of the most important of these benefits is VA Dependents Indemnity Compensation of $1240/month  for survivors, a benefit particularly important to our veterans who do not have military retirements. Another benefit is “Champ-VA” for families of totally disabled veterans without TriCare. 

We’d won,  and now our objectives became getting the word out to thousands of our folks now scattered throughout the country in the decades after our duty aboard the C-123 transports. We'd won, but were left without the retroactive compensation clearly due us, compensation which was supposed to be based on the date of claim application. That is our remaining objective.

14 December 2015

A MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Vietnam War

         Our Nation’s Vietnam War Commemoration is a long-overdue opportunity for all Americans to recognize, honor, and thank our Vietnam Veterans and their families for their service and sacrifices during one of America’s longest wars.

VA Central Office, along with nearly 9,000 organizations across the country, has joined with the Department of Defense as a commemorative partner to honor our Nation’s Vietnam Veterans.  I have designated March 29, 2016, as a day for our Department to express our tremendous gratitude and support to this generation of Americans through ceremonies across the Nation.   

This commemoration recognizes all men and women who served on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces during the U.S. involvement in Vietnam—November 1, 1955, to May 15, 1975.  Nine million Americans, approximately 7.2 million living today, served during that period, and the commemoration makes no distinction between Veterans who served in-county, in-theater, or were stationed elsewhere during those 20 years.  All answered the call of duty. 

This commemoration has special significance for those of us at VA because of our honored mission to serve those who have “borne the battle.”  It’s also an opportunity to remember our VA colleagues who served in this generation of Veterans, to extend our heartfelt appreciation to them and to their families who shared the burden of their loved one’s service. 

Please visit http://www.vietnamwar50th.com/ to learn how your organization or facility can become a commemorative partner.  This partnership provides historical media and beautifully-struck lapel pins and other recognition items for presentation to Vietnam Veterans.

Thank you for your continued service to VA and America’s Veterans.

Robert A. McDonald

02 February 2015

NASDVA Asked to Inform VSOs & Veterans About C-123 Developments

We again have asked the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs to inform C-123 veterans and their survivors of developing eligibility news coming from the VA.

Over the four years of our effort to get VA itself to assist our veterans, NASDA has never responded to inquires or requests and we hope the recent IOM report and VA's reassuring comments since 9 Jan 2015 will help enlist their experts. Even earlier assistance from then-president Dr Linda Schwartz, Connecticut's Commissioner of Veterans Affairs, brought only silence.

We face a tremendous sea-change. VSOs, claims officers, attorneys, veterans themselves and all the web sites and printed literature will have to be inclusive of C-123 veterans' eligibility. Those details, once fleshed out by the VA, need to get in place immediately.
(1/31/2016: actually, we never heard a single word from NASDVA)

16 September 2014

Dr. Linda Schwartz, Former Flight Nurse, Confirmed as Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs!

From all who flew with her, our warmest congratulations!
 Veteran, Connecticut Veterans Commissioner, Nominated by President Obama in August 2013
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert A. McDonald today welcomed the confirmation of Connecticut Veterans Commissioner Linda S. Schwartz as Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Policy and Planning. 
In this post, Dr. Schwartz will help develop and review VA departmental policy, analyze Veteran trends and statistics, and evaluate VA transformation initiatives. She will play a critical role in guiding VA’s strategic planning and work to implement Secretary McDonald’s vision to transform VA into a nimble, high-performing and responsive organization.
“I welcome Dr. Schwartz to our leadership team,” said Secretary McDonald. “Based on her decades of devotion and hard work on behalf of Veterans and Veterans’ causes, I know she will have an immediate impact in the Agency’s continued mission of serving the great men and women who have proudly worn this Nation’s uniform.”
Dr. Schwartz, a disabled veteran, is currently the Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Veterans Affairs, a position she has held since 2003.  She concurrently serves as an Associate Clinical Professor of Nursing at the Yale School of Nursing, where she has been on Faculty since 1999, and was appointed Associate Research Scientist and Scholar.  

From 1980 to 1993, she taught at several University and College Schools of Nursing and held leadership roles in nursing organizations in Connecticut.  From 1979 to 1980, she was a caseworker in the Office of the Field Director of the American Red Cross at Rhein-Main Air Base in Germany. 
Dr. Linda Schwartz
Dr. Schwartz also served in the United States Air Force (USAF) Nurse Corps from 1968 to 1986, both on Active Duty and as a Reservist. She retired as a Flight Nurse Instructor, with the rank of Major after sustaining injuries in a USAF aircraft accident.  

She received her Bachelors of Science degree in nursing from the University of Maryland School Of Nursing; a Master’s of Science degree from Yale University School of Nursing; and a Dr. PH from the Yale University School of Medicine.

23 August 2014

Obama Nominee for Ass't Secretary for Policy & Planning Schwartz Says, "U.S. must find 'better ways' to get medical care to veterans."

Retired Col Linda Schwartz, PhD.
(note: Dr Schwartz once flew with the 74AES from Westover AFB, MA)
Linda Schwartz, the commissioner of Veterans' Affairs in Connecticut, gave the keynote speech at the Community Mental Health Summit hosted by the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) on Fri., Aug. 22, 2014.
Jesse Chambers | jchambers@al.com
Print Jesse Chambers | jchambers@al.com By Jesse Chambers | jchambers@al.com

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama – A recently passed federal law should be good news for veterans seeking to get access to health care through the Veteran's Administration (V.A.), according to Linda Schwartz, the commissioner of Veterans' Affairs in Connecticut.

The Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability and Transparency Act – signed by Pres. Obama about two weeks ago – is "massive" and contains "sweeping changes to call the V.A. to be accountable," Schwartz said today at the Doubletree Hotel downtown just prior to her keynote speech at a Community Mental Health Summit hosted by UAB.

As part of the new law, "we are going to see if some of these things that the V.A. has been doing... are effective or not," Schwartz said.

A U.S. Air Force nurse during the Vietnam War, Schwartz has a doctorate in public health from the Yale School of Medicine.  She is also Obama's nominee as assistant secretary of Veterans Affairs for Policy and Planning at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

12 January 2014

Linda Schwartz (USAF Ret.) Nominated by President as Assistant Secretary Veterans Affairs (Plans)

The White House
January 06, 2014
Vote YES, Senators!

Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate

NOMINATIONS SENT TO THE SENATE::
Linda A. Schwartz, of Connecticut, to be an Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Policy and Planning), vice Raul Perea-Henze, resigned.

Dr. Schwartz was Commissioner for Veterans Affairs for Connecticut. She's also a retired USAF flight nurse, and former president of the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs.
Now the Senate needs to see that Dr. Schwartz brings exactly what the Department of Veterans Affairs needs – leadership, compassion, dedication and dynamic personality. And, she has flown the C-123!
Senators...vote YES! 

04 September 2013

Linda Schwartz Named as VA Asst Secretary Policy & Planning

Connecticut Gov. Malloy, Lt. Gov. Wyman Statements on
Appointment of Commissioner Linda Schwartz to
the U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs
(note: retired AF flight nurse Linda Schwartz, who previously flew with the 74th Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, has left her post as Connecticut's Commissioner for Veterans Affairs to assume duties as Assistant Secretary for VA Policy and Planning. She has been a firm advocate for C-123 exposure issues.)

Governor Dannel P. Malloy and Lieutenant Governor Nancy Wyman applauded Connecticut Department of Veterans Affairs Commissioner Linda Schwartz on her nomination to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. If confirmed, Commissioner Schwartz will serve as the new Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Policy and Planning, a key administration position.

“I applaud President Obama on his nomination,” said Governor Malloy. “For more than ten years, Commissioner Schwartz has been a strong and important voice for veterans in Connecticut, and she is an excellent choice to serve veterans on a national level. Her appointment is also a great loss for
Connecticut. The Commissioner’s integrity and her work on behalf of Connecticut’s veterans and women veterans, and on the Governor’s Veterans Cabinet has a critical impact on improving how the state delivers programs and services to our veterans and military service members. She has greatly improved the lives of our military men and women.”

“I have known and worked with Commissioner Schwartz for a very long time and have witnessed her commitment and passion for countless veteran’s issues first- hand,” Lt. Governor Wyman said. “Connecticut has been fortunate to have her service and her patriotism, and I am confident that in her new role she will bring that same unmatched sense of caring to our nation’s veterans.”

Commissioner Linda Spoonster Schwartz, a retired U.S. Air Force nurse who served from 1968-1986, has led the Connecticut Department of Veterans Affairs since 2003. She is a member of the Governor’s Veterans Cabinet, an in initiative launched by Governor Malloy in 2012 to improve delivery of services to veterans, and played a key role in the creation of veterans.ct.gov, a one-stop tool that links veterans and their families to other state and federal agencies offering services in areas such as employment and job training, health care and education.

Commissioner Schwartz is also the President of the Board of the Connecticut State Veterans Memorial, the state’s first memorial honoring all Connecticut veterans. The Veterans Memorial is being constructed in Minuteman Park across from the William A. O’Neill State Armory in Hartford and will be a site for official observances, activities, and ceremonies that honor veterans. 


Message from VVA National President John Rowan
I am proud to announce that one of our own, Dr. Linda Spoonster Schwartz, has been nominated for the position of Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Policy and Planning at the VA. Linda has been a tireless fighter on behalf of veterans and a long- standing member of VVA. We look forward to her having a large impact on VA operations. Congratulations Linda! 

02 August 2013

Linda Schwartz Goes to Washington: WATCH OUT NOW YOU BUREAUCRATS!


WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts:

Dr. Linda Spoonster Schwartz – Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Policy and Planning, Department of Veterans Affairs


President Obama said, “These dedicated individuals bring a wealth of experience and talent to their new roles and I am proud to have them serve in this Administration.  I look forward to working with them in the months and years to come.”

 Linda Spoonster Schwartz, Nominee for Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Policy and Planning, Department of Veterans Affairs

Linda Schwartz, a disabled veteran, is Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Veterans Affairs, a position she has held since 2003.  She concurrently serves as an Associate Clinical Professor of Nursing at the Yale School of Nursing, where she has been on Faculty since 1999 and was appointed Associate Research Scientist and Scholar.  From 1980 to 1993, she taught at several University and College Schools of Nursing and held leadership roles in Nursing organizations in Connecticut. 

 From 1979 to 1980, she was a caseworker in the Office of the Field Director of the American Red Cross at Rhein-Main Air Base in Germany.  Dr. Schwartz served in the United States Air Force (USAF) Nurse Corps from 1968 to 1986, both on Active Duty and as a Reservist.  She retired as a Flight Nurse Instructor, with the rank of Major after sustaining injuries in a USAF Air Craft accident.  In 2001, she served on the Board of Directors of the American Nurses Association and was elected to the American Academy of Nursing.  From 1996 to 2000, she served as a Member and Chair of the VA Advisory Committee on Women Veterans.  She also previously served as President of the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs.

She received a B.S. from the University of Maryland, an MSN from Yale University School of Nursing, and a Dr.P.H from the Yale University School of Medicine.

12 February 2013

Oregon State Director of Veterans Affairs AGAIN Asked to Support C-123 Claims

Last year, we asked Oregon's Director of Veterans Affairs, Mr. Jim Willis, to support C-123 veterans' claims regarding Agent Orange exposure. His leadership is essential, both in the state and through his leadership positions in the National State Directors of Veterans Affairs. The previous national director, Dr. Linda Schwartz, Commissioner of Veterans Affairs for the State of Connecticut, had suggested we contact Mr. Willis. As an Oregon veteran who'd met Mr. Willis at various ceremonies, I sought his help.

And I was very surprised that he declined. After a year of many requests, phone calls, emails and mailings of our 300-page binder of Air Force documentation, Mr. Willis' office finally responded that he was not "persuaded" of any merit to our request. I'm amazed, and in particular, because the issue had already been carefully examined by Oregon Health Science University's Toxicology Program, which found that our aircrews were indeed exposed to Agent Orange. And we'd already had our situation vetted by both the American Legion and the Vietnam Veterans of America after their careful investigation, and each passed national resolutions demanding recognition of our claims by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Does Mr. Willis, as a state official, require even more official state agencies to vet our C-123 issues? Will he accept University of Oregon if he won't accept OSHU?

This situation with the Oregon DVA was very troubling. In particular, because the American Legion uses Oregon's state Department of Veterans Affairs to represent our Legionnaires' claims. If Director Willis, acting on behalf of the American Legion in representing a veteran's claim isn't "persuaded" with evidence from the State of Oregon (OHSU) why should the VA believe us? And why does Director Willis seem to have such a very high threshold of "persuasion" before he will assist an Oregon veteran? Was he able to rely of scientific materials other than those provided by Oregon Health Sciences University or did he find fault with their investigation of the C-123 contamination? I don't know.

So, I have requested that Director Willis review his decision to avoid helping us. Last week, the following letter was sent to the Oregon Department of Veterans Affairs, with a closing request that if Director Willis remains unpersuaded, that we be allowed to present our request for state help to his department's board of advisors.

--the text of our Association's letter to Director Willis:

Dear Director Willis,
Thank you for your note regarding Ed VanDyke’s new position as Deputy Director. I appreciate his earlier representation of me before the VA in both his ODVA and American Legion capacities. Earlier this year, your office wrote to convey your decision that you were not “persuaded” to assist disabled C-123 veterans such as me in our effort to gain service connection from the VA for Agent Orange exposure while serving aboard our contaminated C-123 transports. 
We earlier gained endorsement of our issue from Dr. Linda Schwartz, Commissioner of Veterans Affairs in Connecticut, when she was president of the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs. It was she who recommended I approach you. Dr. Schwartz is also a retired USAF flight nurse who flew with us on our C-123s…she knows our situation well.  
We also have been fortunate to have Senator Merkely and Congresswoman Bonamici pressing the VA on this issue. As I wrote in my original request to Director Willis, Oregon Health Sciences University completed a detailed study of the C-123 contamination and concluded we were exposed. The CDC Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry concluded that “aircrews operating in this, and similar environments, were exposed.” (Dr. Tom Sinks, Deputy Director). NIH, when asked their input, deferred to Dr. Sink’s opinion as the appropriate source for such a finding. Thus we have the very agencies responsible for determining contamination and exposure issues confirming our exposure, yet the VA ignoring those agency’s input. 
Before turning to you to seek assistance, the validity of our situation was confirmed by both the Vietnam Veterans of America and the American Legion, each of which passed national resolutions calling on the VA to grant service connection. More recently Dr. Linda Birnbaum of the NIH briefed senators’ staffers to explain the science involved about our exposure for the decade we flew them after the Vietnam War. In November, ten scientists and five physicians, from two federal agencies and many universities challenged VA improper and unscientific conclusions reached in opposing C-123 claims. Dr. Birnbaum in 2011 confirmed our veterans' exposure, and as Director of the NIH National Toxicology Program she certainly has the credentials to make that determination. 
The Air Force Reserve Command has confirmed in their June 2011 FOIA response that the aircraft we flew were, in fact, the specific airplanes used in Vietnam for spraying Agent Orange, that proof joining the two Air Force Armstrong Labs tests which concluded in 1979 and 1994 that our aircraft were “heavily contaminated” and “a danger to public health. I have substantiated my own flying hours aboard several of our flying squadron (731st Tactical Airlift Squadron) assigned C-123s, identified as former spray aircraft. I have provided medical nexus letters from my cardiologist as well as Dr. Arnold Schecter, University of Texas Medical School, perhaps the most respected physician in this field.
The VA concedes our aircraft were contaminated but suggests it was minimal, however “minimal” is not a part of the 1991 law nor C.F.R.s in which exposed veterans outside Vietnam were to be treated the same as veterans with boots on the ground. They contest our effort to gain service connection by maintaining that we were not exposed in the airplane…a novel approach not taken before by any federal agency because contamination has always equaled exposure in decision-making cycles.
In toxicology, "exposure" is a separate issue from "contamination", and we have provided the VA scientific proof of exposure via dermal (primary) and inhalation (secondary) routes, and thus, with the established aircraft contamination and whatever Agent Orange-presumptive illnesses a veteran may have, satisfy the requirements set by the law and detailed in the C.F.R.s. When asked their view of our exposure on the C-123, EPA told us “exposure is the contact with a chemical or biological agent and the outer boundary of an organism.” 
Therefore, we have evidenced both contamination and exposure. At least, according to science and medicine, but it seems not to the VA. Again, law does not describe how much dioxin nor the type of dioxin nor the type of exposure to dioxin. The VA’s arbitrary, and for them, customary insertion of additional qualifications to these areas solely to prevent our veterans’ service connection claims is unlawful. 
Recently, my own 2011 application for Agent Orange benefits (our “poster child” claim because I’m already 100% VA and military disabled and thus argue our case without expectation of benefit), while recommended for approval by the Portland VARO, was denied in Washington because, according to the Compensation Division, “TCDD has not actually been shown to cause long-term health problems.” Every other VA document describes the dangers of TCDD, and TCDD is acknowledged to be the most toxic toxin on earth…but not in the perspective of C-123 exposure, according to the VA.
I had the opportunity to brief the Institute of Medicine Agent Orange Committee on our situation on 16 January 2013, and they were amazed that a VA decision-maker still expressed such views decades into the Agent Orange issue. As a veteran, faced with intransigence such as this, I become convinced that the VA seems determined to prevent our claims, however valid. At the March 2012 meeting with VA Public Health and VA Post-Deployment in Senator Burr’s office, VA leaders actually stated they won’t allow C-123 Agent Orange claims. Layers upon layers of proof supporting our claims have been submitted without effect, and there the matter seems to rest, until we gain the attention and support of leaders like the Oregon Director of Veterans Affairs.
 I am not sure what further convincing evidence Oregon requires to gain the State’s assistance and support on this issue. As an Oregon 100% disabled war veteran, I believe I am entitled to turn you as our state’s director to represent me and others like me through leadership in the National Association of State Directors of Veterans Affairs and in veterans affairs in general. 
I need that support now, please. I am again forwarding the various documents that I feel establish our case for both contamination and exposure, and trust they are convincing. If you do not find yourself persuaded, then as the chairman of the C-123 Veterans Association I ask that you bring this issue to the attention of the advisory board for their input and afford me an opportunity to meet with them. 
Sincerely,    
/s/ Wesley T. Carter, Chair 
Major, USAF Retired, Medical Service Corps

19 June 2011

Open Letter - Request for Help from Institute of Medicine Agent Orange Committee




To: Doctor Richard Fenske, Chair and (in turn) Dr Erin Bell, Dr Scott Burchiel, Dr Janice Chambers, Dr Naihua Duan, Dr Peter Gann, Dr Mark Goldberg, Dr Nancy Kerkvliet, Dr Stephen Kritchevsky, Dr Michele Marcus, Dr Linda McCauley, Dr Alvaro Puga, Dr Jeremy Shefner and Dr Hollie Swanson

Dear Members of the Committee,

On behalf of Colonel Arch Battesta, Colonel Ken Wheeler, Colonel Joseph Curley, Lieutenant Colonel Paul Bailey, Lieutenant Colonel Bob Karpinski, Lieutenant Colonel John Harris, Chief Master Sergeant Charles Fusco, Major Al Harrington, Major Gale Harrington, Brigadier General Mike Walker, Major Stephen Clancey, Master Sergeant Steve Caraker, Master Sergeant George Gadbois, the late Master Sergeant Bob Boyd, Colonel Dee Holiday, Lieutenant Colonel Gail Sorenson and her late husband Lieutenant Colonel Art Sorenson, Lieutenant Colonel Ed Kosakoski, our families and an estimated 500 others similarly situated,

We seek the emergency assistance from the Committee in the form of your recommendation to the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense that the dioxin-contaminated aircraft we flew be designated Agent Orange-contaminated sites. Each of the aircraft we seek to have so designated can be identified by historical records, contamination surveys and physical presence of Agent Orange spray apparatus. Agent Orange toxins remained in each of these aircraft until they were destroyed in 2010.

In 1972 the Air Force Reserve began flying the C-123K/UC-123K “Provider” aircraft previously used for Agent Orange spray missions in Vietnam. Dioxin contamination persisted on these aircraft, at least eleven of which were assigned to the squadrons we flew with. Numerous tests by the Air Force in 1993 and later established the harmful levels of dioxin contamination remaining on the surplus aircraft, all then retired after ten years of our use flying missions worldwide. Military concern about the established contamination led the decontamination by destruction of the remaining aircraft by melting them into scrap metal ingots. Air Force and GSA testimony before a federal judge on a 2000 private lawsuit had the aircraft described as “extremely hazardous”, “extremely contaminated” and “extremely dangerous.”

Veterans who flew the Provider during the years we did not suspect its contamination later turned to the Department of the Air Force to help identify the aircrews and maintenance personnel so they could be notified of their likely exposure to dioxin, but the Air Force responded they lacked the ability to identify the personnel involved. Earlier, for some reason, The Air Force Judge Advocate General responsible for the Office of Environmental Law (and her supervisor) recommended restricting information about the aircraft contamination to "within official channels," perhaps appropriately concerned with the reaction of exposed aircrews. 

Speaking personally, this writer would have been concerned, but if I'd been alerted in 1996 when this JAG officer's recommendation was made, I would perhaps have better responded before my cancer, heart attack, heart surgery, diabetes and peripheral neuropathy surfaced in a two month period sixteen years later. I had surgeries for acute peripheral neuropathy, an Agent Orange-presumptive illness, in 1975 and 1976, following my assignment to fly the C-123K.UC-123K starting in 1974. Certainly, what health precautions I would have taken should have been my decision to make, not her decision to keep me from knowing about.

Our group of veterans submitted the several Air Force test results to the Oregon Health Sciences University with the question…"does the dioxin contamination shown on the aircraft tests equate to exposure to dioxin by the aircrews and maintenance workers assigned to those aircraft between 1972-1982?"  The OSHU responded “Most Likely”.

Anecdotal sworn testimony from experienced maintenance workers in the 901st OMS establishes the intense effort after Vietnam to scrape the remaining Agent Orange residue from the aircraft, especially the sub-belly and wing interior sections, with DOD advice being that the residue was harmless and remove the residue and reduce the foul odors to scrape the residue with putty knives, then wash with Dawn dish soap and rinse thoroughly. Yet still, twenty and thirty years after the last Agent Orange spray missions, the aircraft tested in the Air Force words “extremely hazardous”, "extremely dangerous" and "heavily contaminated."

We earnestly seek the Committee’s immediate help. There is no controversy regarding the Air Force’s own tests establishing the presence of harmful levels of contaminants on our airplanes, and there is no controversy regarding eleven of our squadron’s 26 aircraft having been used for Agent Orange spray missions. The OSHU concludes that our exposure while flying and maintaining these toxic aircraft was “most likely” to have occurred. There is no hypothetical situation here...no question about whether we could have been exposed hundreds of miles out at sea or thousands of feet aloft...we point to the multitude of Air Force tests which establish our intense and intimate contact with this contaminated airplane, to the OSHU study, to your own common sense.

We don’t know your procedures or guidelines, but as a small group of veterans with a non-controversial argument for having been exposed to dioxin, we seek your help in whatever manner appropriate, so long as it is soon enough to help our sick veterans seek care through the Department of Veterans Affairs. If you have a different procedure to seek your help, tell me how to proceed. If you are organizationally restricted from what we request, what other help can you give us? 

Hopefuly and Respectfully,

For the C-123K/UC-123K Veterans of 1972-1982


Wesley T. Carter, Major, USAF Retired

 www.c123kcancer.blogspot.com
email: 
rustsilverwings@gmail.com